<?xml version='1.0'?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"  >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Tax Titans - The networking site for professionals: N. A. Palkhivala - The Legend]]></title>
	<link>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/pg/pages/view/91/</link>
		
<item>
<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/pg/pages/view/91/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:20:07 -0600</pubDate>
<link>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/pg/pages/view/91/</link>
<title><![CDATA[N. A. Palkhivala - The Legend]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tax Practicioners Association is dedictated to Shri. N. A. Palkhivala.</p>
<p>There is an interesting article called "My tryst with the legendary N. A. Palkhivala" written by Mr. H. S. Serna, IRS, published <a href="http://www.itatonline.org/articles_new/?p=20" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Apart from that article, the following information from Wikipedia is also relevant.</p>
<p>Nani Palkhivala was called to the bar in 1944 and served in the  chambers of the legendary <span class="new">Sir  Jamshedji Behramji Kanga</span> in Bombay. He quickly gained a reputation as an  eloquent and articulate barrister,  and was often the center of attention in court, where students of law and  younger members of the bar association would flock to watch him. His  excellent court craft and an extraordinary ability to recall barely-known facts  rendered him an irresistible force.</p>
<p>N Palkhivala initial fort&eacute; was commercial and tax law. Together with Sir Jamshedji, he authored what  was then and still is today an authoritative work: <em>The Law and Practice of  Income Tax</em>. Palkhivala was 30 years old at the time of the first printing.  Sir Jamshedji later admitted that the credit for this work belonged exclusively  to Nani.</p>
<p>Palkhivala first participation in a case of constitutional significance  occurred in 1951, where he served as junior counsel in the case <em>Nusserwanji  Balsara vs. <span class="mw-redirect">State of Bombay</span></em> [(1951) Bom 210], assisting  the esteemed Sir Noshirwan Engineer in challenging several provisions of the <span class="new">Bombay  Prohibition Act</span>. Before the year was out, Palkhivala was arguing cases  himself, but his first case of constitutional import (a challenge of the  validity of land requisition acts) was lost before the Bombay High  Court.</p>
<p>By 1954 however, barely 10 years after his admission to the bar, Palkhivala  was arguing before the Supreme Court. It was in this, his  first, case before that court (concerning the interpretation of Article 29(2)  and Article 30 of the Indian Constitution, which regulate the  rights of religious  minorities) that he first articulated his (later) famous statements on the  inviolate nature of the constitution.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
