<?xml version='1.0'?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"  >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Tax Titans - The networking site for professionals: Discussion topics]]></title>
	<link>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/pg/groups/forum/66/</link>
		
<item>
<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=4625&amp;group_guid=66</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:20:12 -0600</pubDate>
<link>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=4625&amp;group_guid=66</link>
<title><![CDATA[Should retd. ITAT Members be allowed to practice?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Friends,</p>
<p>Recently, Hon'ble DHC has held that ex-CEstat cannot practice before the cestat.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Should a similar prohibition apply to the ITAT. There are pros and cons.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I personally feel that they have so much to offer in terms of expertise, experience etc that it would be a shame if their expertise is not used by the ITAT.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The reverse view is that they may influence the Bench with their position.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>However, I feel the risk is overdone.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Do you agree? Please comment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ved Arya</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=90&amp;group_guid=66</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:11:41 -0600</pubDate>
<link>http://itatonline.ksalegal.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=90&amp;group_guid=66</link>
<title><![CDATA[Should Hindi be made the official language of the Courts?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Friends, what is your opinion? The Law Commission says this proposal is not feasible. Do you agree?</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
</item></channel>
</rss>
